« Time to Reframe the Gender Pay Gap Conversation? | Main | Beyond the Compensation Cookbook: The Education of a Reward Pro »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

According to the Student Placement Directors I have known... although there may be wonderful consistency to the top rates offered to the top grads... most of the “offers” reported to NACE always were delivered to a tiny percentage of all graduates. Most graduates actually accepted starting rates far below that offered by dozens of bidders to the top 10%. So I remain a skeptic… suspect their numbers for “average offer” still remain badly skewed to reflect the cream of the crop v. “the average grad.”

But what do I know?


Interesting. I have used NACE data through the years and without a good alternative against which to check its data, it has performed satisfactorily for me. In fact, a few clients have challenged me that some of the averages for technical fields, like engineering, seemed low in comparison to what they were finding in their own recruiting efforts.

Anyone else got a perspective to lend on this?

The comments to this entry are closed.

About The Author

  • More Info Here
    Compensation consultant Ann Bares is the Managing Partner of Altura Consulting Group. Ann has more than 20 years of experience consulting with organizations in the areas of compensation and performance management.

Compensation Force Spot Survey

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search This Site


  • Get this widget from Widgetbox