« The Carnival of HR is Up! | Main | Pay Program Participation & Transparency: a Voice or a Vote? »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Free AND no spam ... a rare combination.

Excellent point, Andres!

Ann,

Am I missing something or am I right that wages for a job are not broken out by experience levels like seniors, intermediates in this survey? Do other surveys have these levels?

Thanks,

Carla,

Carla:

You are correct in your observation. That is one downside of the BLS survey, that none of the positions covered are addressed at more than one level (i.e., Engineer 1, 2, 3 or Accountant Associate, Accountant Senior, etc.) Many, but not necessarily all, professionally published surveys will break out non-management jobs in this manner, to help us define career paths.

I typically assume that the level presented by BLS is a "mid" or "intermediate" level (although the real truth is that it represents "all" levels), when I am using to address multi-level jobs.

I've been using this specific data set for the last several years to compare company aggregate data to a reliable market benchmarket. Over time, I've watched the data set migrate in it's reliability. My only other issue is that it does not report company size. However, if you are in tune with your local marketplace, this is a free gold mine of reliability and an easy sell to employees as they so often quote the CPI rate, same source, same resource, same reliability.

R-

Thanks for the comment and for sharing your experience. I'd be interested to hear a little more about the migration in reliability that you've observed, if you'd be willing to share it here. You are also correct in pointing out the limitation that there is no reporting by company size. For this reason, I do not use the source for management jobs, where pay does tend to be closely related to company size. Probably something I should have pointed out, but glad that you have taken the time to note it.

My reliability comment is more anecdotal than based on collected and analyzed data trends. Maybe for the next iteration, I will start capturing that element as well.

3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About The Author

  • More Info Here
    Compensation consultant Ann Bares is the Managing Partner of Altura Consulting Group. Ann has more than 20 years of experience consulting with organizations in the areas of compensation and performance management.

Compensation Force Spot Survey

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Search This Site

Widgetbox

  • Get this widget from Widgetbox